At this point I think this will never change. Seems like there’s no efficiency that Apple can’t cut like knife through butter with iOS updates. But unless you tell me you’re using like that, 5 hours is too poor. The only problem that I have about this product is that when it's wifi transferring to my iPad Air there's a slight delay when I'm shooting models. Works great just like other class 10 SDHC. I know battery life can be poor if you push it on any iOS version). The distance from camera to iPad Air was much further than I expected. While I understand that heavy use makes all the difference (I’ve used my Xʀ with full brightness, LTE and 4K video and battery life drops to 7 hours. Go ask iOS 17 users what they’re getting with moderately heavy use now. Like I showed above, 16 hours of screen-on time with light use on iOS 12 is possible. I’ve always said that my initial assumption was that the iPhone Xʀ was unbreakable. The processor was so efficient on iOS 15 and the battery life buffer was so large (28 hours of light, extremely efficient use), that I thought that was unbreakable. I thought that maybe the 13 Pro Max would be the first resilient iPhone through sheer “firepower”. The 13 Pro Max was absurdly good on iOS 15, with the device going for something absurd like 28 hours of SOT with light use and now you’re saying that with LTE you get 5 hours on iOS 17? Unless you’re using it extremely heavily, full brightness and something like full GPS, 5 hours is absurd. There’s no hardware overhead updates can’t obliterate. There’s no hardware buffer that Apple can’t break. Click to expand.It’s absurd because it seems that there’s nothing that works.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |